Course Content
Phase 5:The Capstone (The Million Dollar Audit)
We tell the story of Sholto David not as a "news story," but as a Case Study in Tradecraft. He used the exact skills we just taught (Visual Forensics, Source Verification, Institutional Audit) to expose a massive lie and get paid for saving the taxpayer money.
0/1
TRADECRAFT: The Intelligence Analyst’s Guide to the Internet

The Fermi Estimation & The Journalist’s Count

: The Fermi Estimation & The Journalist’s Count

The Concept

Enrico Fermi was a physicist famous for estimating the answer to impossible questions with zero data, just by using logic. In the age of Fake News, this is your primary weapon.

Headlines often throw massive numbers at you to shut down your critical thinking: “2 Million people attended the protest!” or “This policy will cost $500 Trillion!”

Your brain panics at the big number and accepts it. You need a mental circuit breaker to check if that number is physically possible.

TRADECRAFT SKILL: The “10×10” Field Method

Veterans of journalism use a specific technique to count crowds on the ground. Do not guess; count blocks.

The Technique:

  1. Find a Dense Patch: Look at the crowd and isolate a small square where people are standing shoulder-to-shoulder.

  2. The X/Y Count: Count 10 people across (the X axis) and 10 people deep (the Y axis).

  3. The “Century” Block: 10 x 10 = 100 people. Visualize what that square of 100 heads looks like.

  4. Scale Up:

    • Look for 10 of those “Century Blocks” to visualize 1,000 people.

    • Now, simply count how many “1,000-blocks” fill the street.

  5. The Result: You will often find the “Official Number” is 3x or 4x higher than reality.

LAB EXERCISE: The “Crowd Count” Test

Task: Find a photo of a large crowd (e.g., a major concert or protest).

  1. Don’t Guess: Most people look and say “Wow, 500,000 people!”

  2. Apply the Grid: Find a 10×10 patch (100 people).

  3. Multiply: How many of those patches fit in the photo?

  4. The Verdict: You will likely find the crowd is closer to 50,000 than 500,000.


THE DRILL: 10 Practical Fermi Exercises

Use your estimation skills to debunk these common statistical lies.

Exercise 1: The Economic Doom (The Tax Lie)

The Headline: “New Tax Proposal Will Cost the Economy $500 Trillion!”

The Check:

  1. Global Context: What is the GDP of the entire USA? (About $25 Trillion).

  2. The Math: $500 Trillion is 20 times the entire US economy.

    The Verdict: Impossible. You cannot tax more money than exists.

Exercise 2: The Health Scare (The “Everyone” Lie)

The Headline: “Rare Disease Kills 50,000 Americans Every Day!”

The Check:

  1. Annual Math: 50,000/day x 365 days = ~18 Million deaths a year.

  2. Total Deaths: Only about 3 million Americans die total per year (from all causes combined).

    The Verdict: Lie. If this were true, the US population would be extinct in 15 years.

Exercise 3: The Environmental Panic (The Straw Lie)

The Headline: “Americans use 500 Million plastic straws a day.”

The Check:

  1. Population: ~330 Million people in the US.

  2. The Implication: Every single man, woman, and baby must use 1.5 straws every single day.

    The Verdict: Suspicious. (Most adults use 0).

Exercise 4: The Viral Video (The View Count)

The Headline: “This video just hit 8 Billion Views in 24 hours!”

The Check:

  1. Population: There are only ~8 Billion people on Earth.

  2. Internet Access: Only ~60% have internet.

    The Verdict: Lie. It would require every human with a phone to watch it twice.

Exercise 5: The Logistics Scam (The Mars Colony)

The Headline: “We will transport 1 Million people to Mars in 10 years.”

The Check:

  1. The Rate: 1,000,000 / 10 years = 100,000/year (~270 per day).

  2. The Rockets: A Starship holds ~100. You need 3 launches every single day, starting tomorrow.

    The Verdict: Highly Improbable.

Exercise 6: The Physiological Myth (The Spider)

The Myth: “The average human swallows 8 spiders a year while sleeping.”

The Check:

  1. Spider Behavior: Spiders avoid vibrations and heat (predators). A sleeping human is a vibrating, hot giant.

  2. Probability: To swallow 8, you would need spiders crawling into your mouth constantly.

    The Verdict: Lie.

Exercise 7: The Wealth Gap (The “Trillionaire”)

The Headline: “Jeff Bezos could give every human $1 Billion and still be rich.”

The Check:

  1. The Math: $1 Billion x 8 Billion people = $8 Quintillion ($8,000,000,000,000,000,000).

  2. Bezos Net Worth: ~$200 Billion.

    The Verdict: Math Error. He could give everyone about $25.

Exercise 8: The Time Management Guru

The Headline: “I read 10 books a day to stay smart.”

The Check:

  1. Average Book: 60,000 words (4 hours to read).

  2. The Math: 10 books x 4 hours = 40 hours.

    The Verdict: Impossible.

Exercise 9: The Water Crisis (The Ocean)

The Headline: “We are draining the oceans! Sea levels will drop by 10 feet next year.”

The Check:

  1. Volume: Oceans cover 70% of Earth. The water cycle means water doesn’t leave the planet.

    The Verdict: Lie.

Exercise 10: The “Crowd Count” (The Protest Lie)

The Headline: “2 Million People Marched in the City Square Today!”

The Check:

  1. Area: A city square is maybe 200m x 200m = 40,000 sqm.

  2. Density: Max 4 people per sqm.

  3. The Math: 40,000 x 4 = 160,000 people max.

    The Verdict: Lie. To fit 2 million, you need 12 city squares.


LESSON 2.3: Commercial Bias & The Funding Effect

This lesson contains the “Evidence Log” table and the 4 Research Labs. This is distinct from the Fermi/Crowd lesson.

Instructions:

  1. Create/Edit Lesson 2.3 in Tutor LMS.

  2. Title: 2.3 Commercial Bias: The Funding Effect

  3. Content: Copy/Paste the text below.


TRADECRAFT: The Funding Effect

Introduction

In a perfect world, science is neutral. In the real world, science costs money—and whoever pays the piper calls the tune.

Research consistently shows that industry-funded studies are four times more likely to report favorable outcomes for the sponsor’s product than independent research. This isn’t usually due to outright fraud—but to subtle, systemic biases baked into how research is designed, published, and promoted.

This chapter equips you with three forensic tools to detect manipulation:

  • The File Drawer Problem – hiding negative results

  • Ghostwriting – PR firms writing “science” under academic names

  • Astroturfing – fake grassroots movements masking corporate agendas

You will study 10 documented cases, then apply investigative techniques to audit claims yourself—because in modern science, trust must be earned, not assumed.


Part I: The Evidence Log (10 Proven Cases)

Each case below is legally or regulatorily confirmed. Consequences include deaths, billions in fines, and eroded public trust.

Drug / Issue Mechanism Key Facts Consequence
Vioxx (Merck) File Drawer Suppressed heart risk data; published only positive trials. ~140,000 heart attacks; $4.85B settlement.
Paxil Study 329 (GSK) Ghostwriting + File Drawer Buried suicide/inefficacy data; paper falsely claimed safety. $3B fine; FDA black box warning.
Tamiflu (Roche) File Drawer Withheld 8 of 10 trial reports showing limited efficacy. $1.5B+ wasted U.S. stockpiles.
Celebrex (Pfizer) Biased Design + File Drawer Published 6-month “safe” data; hid 12-month harm data. $164M settlement; NSAID safety crisis.
HRT (Wyeth/Pfizer) Ghostwriting PR firm wrote 26 pro-HRT papers signed by academics. 80% usage drop after cancer link; $896M paid.
OxyContin (Purdue) Ghostwriting + Astroturfing Falsely claimed <1% addiction risk via ghostwritten “consensus.” Fueled opioid epidemic (500k+ deaths); $8.3B dissolution.
Avandia (GSK) Suppression + Biased Design Hid internal analysis showing 43% ↑ heart attack risk. FDA restrictions; $460M penalty.
Gardasil (Merck) Biased Design (Placebo) “Placebo” contained aluminum adjuvant—masking side effects. $1B+ in injury claims; global transparency debates.
EPO (J&J/Amgen) Suppression + Biased Comparison Compared drug to ineffective doses; hid tumor growth data. $150M fine; 50% sales drop after black box warning.
Coalition Against Socialized Medicine Astroturfing Pharma-funded “citizen group” opposing price controls. Delayed U.S. drug pricing reform; sustained $500B/year spending.

🔍 Source Verification Tip: All cases are documented by the FDA, DOJ settlements, Cochrane Reviews, BMJ investigations, or court records.


Part II: Research Labs (Your Toolkit)

“Don’t believe. Investigate.”

Lab 1: The Funding Statement Hunt

Mission: Find who paid for a study.

  • Step 1: Locate the original PDF (not news coverage).

  • Step 2: Scroll to the end—look for: “Funding”, “Conflicts of Interest”, or “Acknowledgments”.

  • Red Flag: Funder = product manufacturer.

  • ✅ Exercise: Analyze a recent study on a weight-loss drug (like Ozempic/Wegovy). Is it funded by the maker?

Lab 2: The ClinicalTrials.gov Audit

Mission: Detect hidden failures (The File Drawer).

  • Step 1: Go to ClinicalTrials.gov.

  • Step 2: Search drug name → filter “Completed”.

  • Step 3: Check the “Study Results” column.

  • Red Flag: “No results posted” >2 years post-completion.

  • ✅ Exercise: Check “Lecanemab” (Alzheimer’s drug)—how many trials lack results?

Lab 3: The Astroturf Whois Check

Mission: Unmask fake advocacy groups.

  • Step 1: Visit a group’s website (e.g., “Patients for Pain Relief”).

  • Step 2: Go to who.is → enter the domain name.

  • Step 3: Check “Registrant Organization”.

  • Red Flag: Registered to a PR firm (Edelman, Ketchum) or Pharma HQ.

  • ✅ Exercise: Investigate “Alliance for Safe Medicines”—who really runs it?

Lab 4: The Ghostwriter Trap

Mission: Spot PR-authored “science.”

  • Step 1: Open the medical paper PDF.

  • Step 2: Read Acknowledgments.

  • Step 3: Look for: “Editorial assistance provided by [Company]”.

  • Step 4: Google that company.

  • Reveal: Often a “medical communications agency” like Envision Pharma or Adelphi Communications.

  • ✅ Exercise: Analyze a recent diabetes paper—was it ghostwritten?


Part III: Scenario Drills

Exercise A:

A paper in The Lancet praises Drug X. Acknowledgments say: “Medical writing support by Scientific Solutions Inc.” You find Scientific Solutions lists Drug X’s maker as a client.

  • Mechanism? Ghostwriting.

Exercise B:

A company cites “3 successful trials” for its antidepressant. ClinicalTrials.gov shows 7 additional completed trials with no results.

  • Mechanism? File Drawer Problem.

Exercise C:

“Mothers for Mental Health” urges Congress to approve fast-tracking of a new ADHD drug. Tax filings show 95% funding from the drug’s manufacturer.

  • Mechanism? Astroturfing.

Scroll to Top